Cellulosic Ethanol: it’s the future

For a long time now I’ve held to the position that the energy crisis and the problems of climate change will not be solved by government sanctions on our activities but by technological advances in the free market. People like recent Nobel-Prize winner Al Gore don’t like not knowing exactly what those advances will be [...]

For a long time now I’ve held to the position that the energy crisis and the problems of climate change will not be solved by government sanctions on our activities but by technological advances in the free market. People like recent Nobel-Prize winner Al Gore don’t like not knowing exactly what those advances will be and how they will come about, and prophesy catastrophe if it doesn’t happen right now. But the scientists who work on solutions every day aren’t concerned with the politics of the thing: they’re just quietly making it happen.

This fantastic article in the October 2007 issue of Wired Magazine gives details of what I believe will be the most likely future of energy: cellulosic ethanol. The general idea is this:

“Take a plant and extract the cellulose. Add some enzymes and convert the cellulose molecules into sugars. Ferment the sugar into alcohol. Then distill the alcohol into fuel. One, two, three, four — and we’re powering our cars with lawn cuttings, wood chips, and prairie grasses instead of Middle East oil.”

And the prospects look great:

“Almost everybody believes it’s doable. People disagree whether it’ll take two years or 20.”

And there’s the rub: Al Gore and the environmentalist movement won’t be happy with a solution that takes 20 years. They’re impatient bastards; they want it now. But make no mistake: the future is in the advances of technology, and cellulosic ethanol seems the most likely candidate for the future of fuel. Let’s let them get on with it, and make it as easy as possible for corporations to invest in this stuff: to government, that means ‘Get out of the way.’

2 Comments

  1. Dave Powell on October 18, 2007 | Permalink

    The problem with bio fuel isn’t that it would take years to adapt to it.
    The problem is the damage that Bio fuels are doing at the moment. At the moment its a small but growing sector of the market but If your talking about providing fuel for a larger percentage of the population then we come down to some very difficult choices – Fuel or Food?
    cellulosic ethanol may be a better option than traditional bio fuel but whilst we wait for the technology to catch up the planet suffers.
    The last few years have seen a huge increase in the price of Maize and Wheat, so while the developed world feels morally righteous at filling their cars with bio-fuels we see food riots in Mexico. (there is always a knock on effect somewhere from our lifestyle)
    Yes powering your car from lawn cuttings, wood chips, and prairie grasses sounds cool – but it is still a long way off and in the mean time palm oil plantations are destroying huge chunks of rainforest. So wether you believe in global warning or not surely the rain forests are worth keeping.

  2. S Quinney on October 18, 2007 | Permalink

    Dave you’re right about corn-based ethanol, it’s a disaster. Why cut our own throats? A simple bag of corn chips is going up in price because we’re trying to make lousy fuel from corn, a very inefficient process. But this cellulose stuff sounds very different and isn’t really related at all as far as I can tell. The article you linked to John is very interesting.

4 Trackbacks

  1. Monbiot’s never happy on November 9, 2007

    [...] There are a couple of other very strong solutions which just aren’t available quite yet: cellulosic ethanol, which we’ve mentioned before and which will allow us to use grass and wood and a majority of [...]

  2. On waste on November 12, 2007

    [...] recently mentioned cellulosic ethanol, fuel created from a good two-thirds of what we’re currently throwing away, and what [...]

  3. LA Times: Food or fuel on February 26, 2008

    [...] creating a food deficit? Well it’s already begun the job. Hydrogen fuel cell. Nuclear power. Cellulosic ethanol (extremely promising, especially as compared to the corn variety). Perhaps in the near-term [...]

  4. [...] in October last year, I claimed that “Cellulosic ethanol is the future.” Today, there are a bunch of cellulosic ethanol companies claiming that very thing, and [...]

POST A COMMENT

Your email is never published nor shared.

FOLLOW

John on Facebook

LISTEN

John at KLPZ

OP-ED

John Wright Op-Ed