Comments on: Senator Larry Craig: trouble in the men’s room http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room Not Facebook Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:58:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: John http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-952 John Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:32:53 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-952 JD- I'm very surprised to hear that you like Ron Paul. I'm a very very enthusiastic for Paul- he's my dream ticket for 2008. Unfortunately he doesn't have a chance against the 2-party big dogs, but he's shocked a lot of people so far. The size of his campaign chest is one astonishing example.... a libertarian collecting more financial support than John McCain is incredible. Glad you stuck around. :-) JD- I’m very surprised to hear that you like Ron Paul. I’m a very very enthusiastic for Paul- he’s my dream ticket for 2008. Unfortunately he doesn’t have a chance against the 2-party big dogs, but he’s shocked a lot of people so far. The size of his campaign chest is one astonishing example…. a libertarian collecting more financial support than John McCain is incredible. Glad you stuck around. :-)

]]> By: JD Davis http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-951 JD Davis Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:09:16 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-951 John thank you You have answered my questions and allowed my post. you da man~ ! What can we expect in the near future... topics & articles? Can you write an article or maybe email me your thoughts on Ron Paul. Smaller government and this man follows the US constitution. Call me simple minded (no don't you dare) But yes, thus far...Ron has my vote. JD John thank you
You have answered my questions and allowed my post.

you da man~ !

What can we expect in the near future… topics & articles?

Can you write an article or maybe email me your thoughts on Ron Paul.
Smaller government and this man follows the US constitution. Call me simple minded (no don’t you dare) But yes, thus far…Ron has my vote.

JD

]]> By: JD Davis http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-948 JD Davis Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:31:16 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-948 Your points were nothing...Nothing! other than "your views" and nothing less nothing more. Do you really expect people to suck unto your views? what be cause it's your web blog? PLEASE! The only fact remains was your point I agreed with, You have a member who represents the people who elected him. And he wants to play footsy w/cop hoping for a homosexual act...Yet votes and portrays republican "family values" ? Independently thinking.... That's a hypocrite who does not represent his people or the GOP right wing. I guess you can sit on the fence?...I can't If and only if he was a standard homosexual NOT pretending to be the moral right majority. I personally would not make a call or judgment on his moral character. he pled guilty...not I and you...your simply looking for an argument. C'mon jump off your fence. Good day JD Your points were nothing…Nothing!
other than “your views” and nothing less nothing more.
Do you really expect people to suck unto your views?
what be cause it’s your web blog? PLEASE!
The only fact remains was your point I agreed with,
You have a member who represents the people
who elected him. And he wants to play footsy w/cop
hoping for a homosexual act…Yet votes and portrays
republican “family values” ?
Independently thinking…. That’s a hypocrite who does
not represent his people or the GOP right wing.

I guess you can sit on the fence?…I can’t
If and only if he was a standard homosexual
NOT pretending to be the moral right majority.
I personally would not make a call or judgment
on his moral character.

he pled guilty…not I and you…your simply looking
for an argument. C’mon jump off your fence.

Good day
JD

]]> By: John http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-947 John Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:27:01 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-947 JD- Thanks for coming back. My apologies for the omission. I assure you it wasn't an effort at censorship: what happened was that this new site was created between comment 9 above and your next comment which I did see on libertarianreason.com. I'll see if I can get it back for you. JD- Thanks for coming back. My apologies for the omission. I assure you it wasn’t an effort at censorship: what happened was that this new site was created between comment 9 above and your next comment which I did see on libertarianreason.com. I’ll see if I can get it back for you.

]]> By: JD Davis http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-946 JD Davis Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:14:43 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-946 John, 1st let me say- Nice layout on the new site here. But hey John, Where's my 2nd responce to your rebutle above? whats the editing game? I do understand it's your blog and personal views. But why would you leave out my sencond responce? You put my 1st (as seen above) then you responded. Asking me for a responce. I made a good responce and maybe it was too honest for you? That's dirty pool, or 2 sided politics, in laymans terms.... You don't like to be challeneged on your blog. I mean come on John, with your freedom of speech as to Irans leader - Yet, block my rebutle? I see you also failed to post my other comments on other threads? As a libertarian seeking a smaller government...would that be censorship too John? Site looks good thus far....But accept different points of views. As soon as you (re)post my 2nd comment I will post again. recanting....almost "flip flopping" this view. I'm not here to cause waves. Maybe a fer ripples in the water but, only to get your views though questioning your tatics and personal spins on topics. JD John, 1st let me say- Nice layout on the new site here.

But hey John,
Where’s my 2nd responce to your rebutle above?
whats the editing game?
I do understand it’s your blog and personal views.
But why would you leave out my sencond responce?
You put my 1st (as seen above) then you responded. Asking me for a responce. I made a good responce and maybe it was too honest for you?
That’s dirty pool, or 2 sided politics, in laymans terms….
You don’t like to be challeneged on your blog.
I mean come on John,
with your freedom of speech as to Irans leader – Yet, block my rebutle?

I see you also failed to post my other comments on other threads?
As a libertarian seeking a smaller government…would that be censorship too John?

Site looks good thus far….But accept different points of views.

As soon as you (re)post my 2nd comment I will post again.
recanting….almost “flip flopping” this view.
I’m not here to cause waves. Maybe a fer ripples in the water but, only to get your views though questioning your tatics and personal spins on topics.

JD

]]> By: C http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-930 C Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:04:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-930 The ACLU has taken Larry Craig's side. He's done nothing wrong. The ACLU has taken Larry Craig’s side. He’s done nothing wrong.

]]> By: John Wright http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-929 John Wright Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:23:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-929 JD- Welcome. Your comment strikes me as self-deluded: you believe you are a rare "true independent" and that your point is above what you accuse of mine (that it's "political spin"), yet you admit you think the only point I got right was the only one accusing Craig of wrongdoing! This is self-defeating, since despite your confidence in your own objectivity, you've picked the only one that a left-wing, non-independent liberal would agree with. <br/><br/>In any case, you've offered no criticism of my other points, so you haven't left me with anything except an impression of a guy who sincerely believes himself to be a free thinker, but in reality is anything but.<br/><br/>Thanks for stopping by. JD- Welcome. Your comment strikes me as self-deluded: you believe you are a rare “true independent” and that your point is above what you accuse of mine (that it’s “political spin”), yet you admit you think the only point I got right was the only one accusing Craig of wrongdoing! This is self-defeating, since despite your confidence in your own objectivity, you’ve picked the only one that a left-wing, non-independent liberal would agree with.

In any case, you’ve offered no criticism of my other points, so you haven’t left me with anything except an impression of a guy who sincerely believes himself to be a free thinker, but in reality is anything but.

Thanks for stopping by.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-928 Anonymous Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:00:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-928 You can defend and justify Craigs act<br/>anyway you want with minor points of<br/>what you view as right....It wreaks of political spin. Not that I'm homophobic at all. But your post #5 points to the only FACT that needs to be addressed in your article (or personal view) or as I and most would see the reality - SPIN <br/><br/><b>5) If Senator Craig was in the bathroom soliciting gay sex, he's a hypocrite. During the course of his career he has been vocal against homosexuality and has voted against gay rights on many occasions.</b><br/><br/> -No problem with his taste or flavor twords men. But if found guilty~ *And did he not enter a plea guilt? If you had morals of political correctness...You would agree The senator is 110% hypocrite.<br/>Step down. <br/><br/>And wasn't he not previously arrested or question about a previous sexual act? <br/><br/>Show me a (deviant hypocrite) man who has been caught once....And I'll show the same man who has escaped justice 1,000 times. <br/><br/>Step down Craig and admit your inner feelings for your male sexual tendencies! <br/><br/>JD Davis - true independent You can defend and justify Craigs act
anyway you want with minor points of
what you view as right….It wreaks of political spin. Not that I’m homophobic at all. But your post #5 points to the only FACT that needs to be addressed in your article (or personal view) or as I and most would see the reality – SPIN

5) If Senator Craig was in the bathroom soliciting gay sex, he’s a hypocrite. During the course of his career he has been vocal against homosexuality and has voted against gay rights on many occasions.

-No problem with his taste or flavor twords men. But if found guilty~ *And did he not enter a plea guilt? If you had morals of political correctness…You would agree The senator is 110% hypocrite.
Step down.

And wasn’t he not previously arrested or question about a previous sexual act?

Show me a (deviant hypocrite) man who has been caught once….And I’ll show the same man who has escaped justice 1,000 times.

Step down Craig and admit your inner feelings for your male sexual tendencies!

JD Davis – true independent

]]> By: R Paglia http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-925 R Paglia Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:46:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-925 Hi all. Just popping in. Agree John! Agree! Hi all. Just popping in. Agree John! Agree!

]]> By: John Wright http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-922 John Wright Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:06:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-922 Greg- Why do I get the impression that you were willfully ignorant of the other points I made with regard to Craig and acceptant of the only one you already agreed with, divorcing it from the rest of my argument?<br/><br/>With regard to the BBC licence argument, give me your best critique here and I'll be happy to respond. Greg- Why do I get the impression that you were willfully ignorant of the other points I made with regard to Craig and acceptant of the only one you already agreed with, divorcing it from the rest of my argument?

With regard to the BBC licence argument, give me your best critique here and I’ll be happy to respond.

]]> By: Greg, Sacramento http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-921 Greg, Sacramento Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:45:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-921 John you old bastard, back causing trouble again? And I see the argument on the license fee below, wondering why you didn't open up comments on it since I can think of quite a few I'd like to make? With regard to Craig, you're right to point out he's a hypocrite, he deserves everything he got. John you old bastard, back causing trouble again? And I see the argument on the license fee below, wondering why you didn’t open up comments on it since I can think of quite a few I’d like to make? With regard to Craig, you’re right to point out he’s a hypocrite, he deserves everything he got.

]]> By: Quinney http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-920 Quinney Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:27:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-920 Great to see you back, and I completely agree with what you wrote above, I already wondered what was so horrible about what he did. Sex in a public bathroom, ok, but this wasn't even close. I think the case was so thin that if he'd gotten a lawyer straightaway and fought it like he should have, he wouldn't be in the shit he is now. Great to see you back, and I completely agree with what you wrote above, I already wondered what was so horrible about what he did. Sex in a public bathroom, ok, but this wasn’t even close. I think the case was so thin that if he’d gotten a lawyer straightaway and fought it like he should have, he wouldn’t be in the shit he is now.

]]> By: John Wright http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-917 John Wright Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:44:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-917 It was certainly a foolish belief to think that the public would not find out, but I don't believe a case can be made for his guilt on the basis that he pleaded guilty, considering the options. Thanks for posting!<br/><br/>By the way, comments are still active, though I've decided only some posts will need them: some are simply for the purpose of information or a 'quick point' rather than for debate. There may be some changes afoot for the future of this blog, so watch this space. It was certainly a foolish belief to think that the public would not find out, but I don’t believe a case can be made for his guilt on the basis that he pleaded guilty, considering the options. Thanks for posting!

By the way, comments are still active, though I’ve decided only some posts will need them: some are simply for the purpose of information or a ‘quick point’ rather than for debate. There may be some changes afoot for the future of this blog, so watch this space.

]]> By: Jambin http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/comment-page-1/#comment-914 Jambin Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:19:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2007/09/02/senator-larry-craig-trouble-in-the-mens-room/#comment-914 John, glad to see we are allowed to leave comments! I think there's no way he was not guilty. I can see that what you say is correct, he had a very good reason to plead guilty, but it was a big mistake as the press found out anyway! There was no way that after 2 months of considering it, he couldn't reason that the press would find out anyway and come clean about what happened, all guns blazing if necessary. John, glad to see we are allowed to leave comments! I think there’s no way he was not guilty. I can see that what you say is correct, he had a very good reason to plead guilty, but it was a big mistake as the press found out anyway! There was no way that after 2 months of considering it, he couldn’t reason that the press would find out anyway and come clean about what happened, all guns blazing if necessary.

]]>