<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why, isn&#8217;t that a chocolate Jesus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/</link>
	<description>Free speech on terrestrial radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scary Jesus &#124; John Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-5882</link>
		<dc:creator>Scary Jesus &#124; John Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-5882</guid>
		<description>[...] The highly anticipated sequel to Chocolate Jesus. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The highly anticipated sequel to Chocolate Jesus. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Golden Compass controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>The Golden Compass controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>[...] you to see it. Bill Donohue is the president of the Catholic League (a group we&#8217;ve heard from before), and he has said that the film may cause children to read the books, which &#8220;promote atheism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you to see it. Bill Donohue is the president of the Catholic League (a group we&#8217;ve heard from before), and he has said that the film may cause children to read the books, which &#8220;promote atheism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Quinney</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>S Quinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>I quite like the idea of creating confectionary religious art.  How about the liquorice sermon on the mount, or the marshmallow last supper?  Or maybe we could have an entire life of Jesus in honeycomb?  If you ask me the best ingredient would be nuts: that would speak volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like the idea of creating confectionary religious art.  How about the liquorice sermon on the mount, or the marshmallow last supper?  Or maybe we could have an entire life of Jesus in honeycomb?  If you ask me the best ingredient would be nuts: that would speak volumes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>If someone feels that a certain art-peice is blasphemous, it should be within their rights to try to get it banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone feels that a certain art-peice is blasphemous, it should be within their rights to try to get it banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Quinney</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>S Quinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the matter, WTK55, don&#039;t have a sweet tooth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the matter, WTK55, don&#8217;t have a sweet tooth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTK55</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>WTK55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Bloody ridiculous. In all that you said they were free to do, they used that freedom in stupid ways.  The artist was free to make a chocolate Jesus, but it was a useless thing to do.  The Catholic League was free to protest, but why do it?  This whole story is just stupid, and the idea in the first place was sensationalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody ridiculous. In all that you said they were free to do, they used that freedom in stupid ways.  The artist was free to make a chocolate Jesus, but it was a useless thing to do.  The Catholic League was free to protest, but why do it?  This whole story is just stupid, and the idea in the first place was sensationalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Agree with both of you....  in addition, here&#039;s another aspect to the thing that I agree with wholeheartedly:  Michelle Malkin asks, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007208.htm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How would the MSM cover Chocolate Mohammed at Ramadan?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with both of you&#8230;.  in addition, here&#8217;s another aspect to the thing that I agree with wholeheartedly:  Michelle Malkin asks, <a HREF="http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007208.htm" REL="nofollow">How would the MSM cover Chocolate Mohammed at Ramadan?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Love this, actually it seems very well done.  it looks lifelike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this, actually it seems very well done.  it looks lifelike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Quinney</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>S Quinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2007/03/30/why-isnt-that-a-chocolate-jesus/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I completely agree.  The government happens in this rare case to be blameless!  What a turnup for the books!  It is unfortunate that religious people can&#039;t see something they disagree with for religious reasons without protesting about it or trying to get it banned, but at least rights were upheld in this case and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if this isn&#039;t the last time we see chocolate jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.  The government happens in this rare case to be blameless!  What a turnup for the books!  It is unfortunate that religious people can&#8217;t see something they disagree with for religious reasons without protesting about it or trying to get it banned, but at least rights were upheld in this case and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if this isn&#8217;t the last time we see chocolate jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
