<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Frum on North Korea&#8217;s Nuclear Ambitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/</link>
	<description>Free speech on terrestrial radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>&quot;The United States of America is a nation that has a strong non-aggression ethic&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Wow.  Apply your superlative of choice to use with &#039;ironic&#039;, now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The United States of America is a nation that has a strong non-aggression ethic&#8221; </p>
<p>Wow.  Apply your superlative of choice to use with &#8216;ironic&#8217;, now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Derek-  It&#039;s gone way beyond disrespect.  And your argument doesn&#039;t work: it assumes that our humanitarian efforts in North Korea are and have been already producing good results in the situation.  Unfortunately that hasn&#039;t been the case, thus the current drama.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PS All-  I&#039;ve fixed the links in this post.  Apologies for the 404.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek-  It&#8217;s gone way beyond disrespect.  And your argument doesn&#8217;t work: it assumes that our humanitarian efforts in North Korea are and have been already producing good results in the situation.  Unfortunately that hasn&#8217;t been the case, thus the current drama.</p>
<p>PS All-  I&#8217;ve fixed the links in this post.  Apologies for the 404.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek, Kalamazoo</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek, Kalamazoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that you get people on your side by taking away their food and generally disrespecting them, that&#039;s what&#039;s wrong with western foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that you get people on your side by taking away their food and generally disrespecting them, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s wrong with western foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTK55</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>WTK55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Interesting how the conversation has gone from pacifism in the last post to a nonviolent approach to dealing with N.Korea in this post! Ultimately we are talking in both the case of private citizens with firearms and in the case of nations with nuclear weapons, what do we do in response to violent people in the world who pose a threat to us? How to respond to evil? I think we all basically agree that nonviolent approaches are preferred, but what separates us is whether we believe &#039;military&#039; solutions should be used if the former fail to solve the problem. Guns and nukes are a last resort, but I believe they are important for self-defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the conversation has gone from pacifism in the last post to a nonviolent approach to dealing with N.Korea in this post! Ultimately we are talking in both the case of private citizens with firearms and in the case of nations with nuclear weapons, what do we do in response to violent people in the world who pose a threat to us? How to respond to evil? I think we all basically agree that nonviolent approaches are preferred, but what separates us is whether we believe &#8216;military&#8217; solutions should be used if the former fail to solve the problem. Guns and nukes are a last resort, but I believe they are important for self-defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Kim Jong il has only one motive in becoming a nuclear personality on the world stage and that is to draw the U.S. to the negotiating table, the nuclear test was a expression of North Korean intentions to face the U.S. at the negotiating table. This information was quoted to the South Korean news agency Yonhap by an unnamed North Korean official.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I believe the danger not to be of a direct threat, I doubt North Korea will be hostile to neighbouring counties who they rely on for aid, the problem is that they may sell their nuclear knowledge to the highest bid through their criminal network  were they have many contacts throughout the criminal and terrorist underworld.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kim Jong il is nothing more than a criminal gangster on the world stage who is into drugs, fake brand cigarettes, (I am certain that these cigarettes are being sold on the streets of Belfast and other cities in the U.K.),  weapons being sold to Iran, and lots more but what has been most significant to the U.S.  has been the North Korean attempt to undermine the U.S. economy with the counterfeit supper Dollar this  trail led to Belfast through a notorious Irish Republican Sean Garland who had been tracked from North Korea via Russia to the U.K., he escaped from British jurisdiction while on bail and is now a fugitive in the Republic of Ireland who don’t have extradition treaty with the U.S.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. and Japan need to congregate together all the diplomatic assistance they can, they need to get Russia, South Korea, and China behind them to support an ousting of Kim Jong il but I doubt this idea will get their full support because these countries support a continuance of the Kim Jong il regime because they fear a exodus on mass to their borders which would cause chaos in their eyes if he was overthrown. I believe this to be the only option to bring a lasting solution to this dilemma of a nuclear threat from North Korea.  I doubt that sanctions will affect Kim Jong il, it will be the suffering people of North Korea that would suffer under any sanctions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim Jong il has only one motive in becoming a nuclear personality on the world stage and that is to draw the U.S. to the negotiating table, the nuclear test was a expression of North Korean intentions to face the U.S. at the negotiating table. This information was quoted to the South Korean news agency Yonhap by an unnamed North Korean official.</p>
<p>I believe the danger not to be of a direct threat, I doubt North Korea will be hostile to neighbouring counties who they rely on for aid, the problem is that they may sell their nuclear knowledge to the highest bid through their criminal network  were they have many contacts throughout the criminal and terrorist underworld.</p>
<p>Kim Jong il is nothing more than a criminal gangster on the world stage who is into drugs, fake brand cigarettes, (I am certain that these cigarettes are being sold on the streets of Belfast and other cities in the U.K.),  weapons being sold to Iran, and lots more but what has been most significant to the U.S.  has been the North Korean attempt to undermine the U.S. economy with the counterfeit supper Dollar this  trail led to Belfast through a notorious Irish Republican Sean Garland who had been tracked from North Korea via Russia to the U.K., he escaped from British jurisdiction while on bail and is now a fugitive in the Republic of Ireland who don’t have extradition treaty with the U.S.</p>
<p>The U.S. and Japan need to congregate together all the diplomatic assistance they can, they need to get Russia, South Korea, and China behind them to support an ousting of Kim Jong il but I doubt this idea will get their full support because these countries support a continuance of the Kim Jong il regime because they fear a exodus on mass to their borders which would cause chaos in their eyes if he was overthrown. I believe this to be the only option to bring a lasting solution to this dilemma of a nuclear threat from North Korea.  I doubt that sanctions will affect Kim Jong il, it will be the suffering people of North Korea that would suffer under any sanctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Alan-  It&#039;s a good point, though it&#039;s likely to make the American and British Left even angrier than the North Koreans.  Nevertheless I think Frum&#039;s argument is strong; they fear having another nuclear neighbour who is opposed to them, since with the backing of China they feel empowered and free to do as they please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan-  It&#8217;s a good point, though it&#8217;s likely to make the American and British Left even angrier than the North Koreans.  Nevertheless I think Frum&#8217;s argument is strong; they fear having another nuclear neighbour who is opposed to them, since with the backing of China they feel empowered and free to do as they please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I think I can agree with all of Frum&#039;s points except for giving Japan a nuclear weapon, that seems a little sudden and possibly could send the wrong message making North Korea even angrier and more determined to carry out what evil it has in mind.  Also they might remember WWII...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I can agree with all of Frum&#8217;s points except for giving Japan a nuclear weapon, that seems a little sudden and possibly could send the wrong message making North Korea even angrier and more determined to carry out what evil it has in mind.  Also they might remember WWII&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalita Paglia</title>
		<link>http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalita Paglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-wright.net/2006/10/10/david-frum-on-north-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>I agree, this is by far the best solution I have seen since I don&#039;t think we have the will for a fight right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this is by far the best solution I have seen since I don&#8217;t think we have the will for a fight right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
