Colonol Jeff Cooper: a tribute post

Colonol Jeff Cooper, philosopher, author, history instructor, adventurer, columnist – widely recognised as the father of the Modern Technique of handgun shooting – died on Monday peacefully at the age of 86. This is a man who made a mark. (Actually, he made thousands of .45 caliber holes, if we’re talking literally.) Colonol Cooper coined [...]

Colonol Jeff Cooper, philosopher, author, history instructor, adventurer, columnist – widely recognised as the father of the Modern Technique of handgun shooting – died on Monday peacefully at the age of 86.

This is a man who made a mark. (Actually, he made thousands of .45 caliber holes, if we’re talking literally.) Colonol Cooper coined terms, created standards and did so with a wealth of sheer life experience.

Anyone who has received pistol training has been influenced by the teaching of Colonol Cooper, beknowest to them or not. When I qualified for my Arizona concealed weapons permit last year, I was not aware that the handgun techniques taught to me during my training were those emphasised by Cooper: the Weaver stance, the four ‘conditions’ of a semiautomatic pistol, the colour-coded combat mindset, and the four basic rules of gun safety that now form an integral part of almost every firearms training doctrine.

But further to that, Colonol Cooper was a political philosopher who was thoughtful about learning from human history and advocated that civilians not only be permitted to own and carry firearms but that they be encouraged to do so: “The rifle is a weapon. Let there be no mistake about that. It is a tool of power, and thus dependent completely upon the moral stature of its user. It is equally useful in securing meat for the table, destroying group enemies on the battlefield, and resisting tyranny. In fact, it is the only means of resisting tyranny, since a citizenry armed with rifles simply cannot be tyrannized.”

And these are wise words on the debate about gun control: “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles”.

Comments on Cooper’s passing at libertarian blog Samizdata.net today include: “A fine man. Colonel Cooper changed the world of personal security.” “The fact that I can actually hit a man-sized target at 30 feet is attributable to him.” “I couldn’t begin to list the number and nature of that which I’ve learned from his writings.” “A gentleman’s gentleman.” “Remember him to for the concept of the Scout Rifle.”

Cooper was also responsible for coining the term ‘hoplophobia’ to describe an irrational fear of firearms, a phobia that is perhaps more common today than a fear of heights. He didn’t mind hunting either, regarding the African gorilla as one of the top pistol trophies: “If you threaten his group he will charge, and a charging gorilla is a fearful spectacle. To stand your ground with a handgun and flatten him at 15 feet is man’s work.”

Folks: Where are such men in our legislature?

John Wright

johnwright@libertarianreason.com

33 Comments

  1. Rosalita Paglia on September 28, 2006 | Permalink

    This man was one of the best. My husband and I went through a course at Front Sight near Las Vegas a few years ago which was directly influenced by Jeff Cooper. My favorite Cooper quote is when someone asked him if we needed gun control because of all the shootings in Los Angeles, he said ‘The consensus is that no more than five to ten people in a hundred who die by gunfire in Los Angeles are any loss to society. These people fight small wars amongst themselves. It would seem a valid social service to keep them well-supplied with ammunition.’ HAHAHA!

  2. Chris, AZ on September 28, 2006 | Permalink

    Where, indeed? This guy was articulate, scholarly, and yet devoted to the idea of individual liberty and the pursuit of adventure. He will be missed!

  3. Jeff on September 29, 2006 | Permalink

    Sounds like a great man.

  4. S Quinney on October 1, 2006 | Permalink

    I hadn’t heard of Jeff Cooper before reading this post, the link you gave is great and his wikipedia entry is rather interesting.

  5. John Wright on October 2, 2006 | Permalink

    Rosalita- I’ve heard of the Front Sight institute although have never been there. And the quote you gave about LA is priceless.

  6. Bill Corr on October 2, 2006 | Permalink

    why do we need fire arms in society to-day boys with their toys.

  7. Brian on October 2, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill, you clearly are living in a dreamworld. Why do we need firearms? Because there are people who are victims of crime, rape and murder who would NOT be at the whim of their attackers if they were allowed to possess firearms.

    Rather I think the onus is on YOU who wants to ban firearms to tell me why you are wishing to disarm the most vulnerable of our society???? And why “boys with their toys” should also be banned, if that’s what you see firearms as?

  8. S Quinney on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    And that is precisely the problem Bill. You say you have seen at first hand experience what firearms do, but a firearm is just a tool my friend; rather, you have seen first hand what human EVIL can do. Attributing this evil to a firearm is like attributing the building of a house to a hammer rather than the builder who USED the hammer to build it!

    You mention the Northern Ireland troubles. But 99 percent of the firearms used for evil purposes during that time were ILLEGAL. You acknowledge this, saying that whether firearms are legal or illegal they can be used for evil purposes. That’s precisely the point Brian was trying to make – if bad guys have guns regardless of the law, then why would laws banning guns help us out any? To the contrary, the laws banning guns simply remove any adequate means of protection from a populace who are now incapable of defending themselves properly!

  9. John Wright on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Hi guys. I’ve written four articles on this subject that are indexed here; they may be a better primer for debate as they cover the points that Quinney and Brian raise.

  10. Brian on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill…. you’re doing a great job of proving my point!!!! Guns aren’t the problem, human evil is! So why ban guns? Why not ban hammers which are used in more spousal abuse than any other weapon?????

  11. BILL on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    The more guns you put into legal circulation, the more availability and potential you give the criminal, having a legal fire arm won’t make a difference.

  12. S Quinney on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill, I’m afraid there just isn’t any evidence to back up your assertion. Gun crime in England is at an all-time high right now. Pray tell, where did they get the guns, since all guns are illegal???

  13. BILL on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Legal gun dealers who also have black market trade.

  14. S Quinney on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    So they got the guns from the black market. ILLEGAL guns. Not legal guns, but illegal.

    Doesn’t that make nonsense of your assertion that allowing citizens to own guns legally is responsible for gun crime?

  15. Brian on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Wow, I didn’t realize John that you had written those great articles on this subjet… Bill have you read them? They are very compelling. http://www.libertarianreason.com/2006/05/defending-firearms-index.html

  16. BILL on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    In the 14 deadliest mass shootings committed in wealthy nations during the past 35 years, 79% of the victims were shot with lawfully held firearms (185 of 233 victims),86% of these mass shooting (12 of 14) were committed by lawful gun owners.29 Jul 1999 Atlanta, GA, USA 12 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 16 Oct 1991 Killeen, TX, USA 23 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 18 Jun 1990 Jacksonville, FL, USA 9 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 06 Dec 1989 Montreal, Canada 14 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 20 Aug 1986 Edmond, OK, USA 14 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 18 Jul 1984 San Ysidro, CA, USA 21 + 1 dead, Legal guns, 01 Aug 1966 Austin, TX, USA 16 + 1 dead, Legal guns.

  17. S Quinney on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill you wouldn’t be tugging the facts along behind your theories, would you? “deadliest mass shootings” is a very selective statistic, why don’t you look at ALL shootings? You’d see a very different picture. But while you’re talking about deadly shootings, what about Dunblane School – happened in Scotland where such firearms are illegal, or the school shooting a couple of weeks ago in Canada where such firearms are illegal.

  18. BILL on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Mass killings have a bigger impact on society.

  19. S Quinney on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill, that’s not the point. The point is that you’re trying to prove that guns should be illegal because it would prevent death and I’m telling you that’s not bourne out by the figures. Meantime you are focusing only on shootings which took place en masse, which constitutes less than HALF A PERCENT of shootings. Why are you focusing on less than half a percent of shootings? Could it be because gun-control-network.org is the site you found that best matched your theory?

  20. Brian on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    S Quinney I’m sure that if Bill actually read the statistics on this blog (that John posted earlier) he would have a change of mind, but my guess is that he hasn’t read them.

  21. Anonymous on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Just delete the truth:

  22. Anonymous on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Why put a delete bin on Bill’s post; how can you delete the truth.The facts speak for themselves.

  23. Bill Corr on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Samuel Corr.
    Margaret Caulfield.

    YOU ARE REMEMBERED.

    They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
    Age shall not weary them, nor the years contemn.
    At the going down of the sun and in the morning
    We will remember them.

    JUST BIN THE TRUTH

  24. BILL on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Joh 8:32 and the truth shall make you free.

  25. Bill Corr on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Bill the bin: get real john “truth”

  26. Anonymous on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    John just like your “DA” can’t own upto the truth.

  27. John Wright on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    If someone is deleting comments, I’d like to know about it. Please contact me at johnwright@libertarianreason.com if you want to report any abuse of this blog. Other than that, I’ll have to assume that Bill has been deleting his own comments, and if that’s what he wishes to do then I won’t stop him.

  28. John Wright on October 3, 2006 | Permalink

    Anonymous- I’d like to find out what you meant by that comment.

  29. Stephen on October 4, 2006 | Permalink

    Holy crap…I’m off on paternity leave and when I return the blog’s on fire…

    Interesting blog John…enjoyed it very much.

    I’d weigh in here with some further comments, but I probably don’t need to.

    SG

  30. William (Bill) Jones on January 25, 2011 | Permalink

    Having been involved in the fight against inane firearms legislation in Canada since 1969, one could only wish that articles such as the above were printed in the mass media -obviously a wish that cannot come true – as we in Canada suffer from the same idiocy of “follow the leader” attitudes from the leftists in our politics/acedemia and press, et cetera. However, even at my age now, after 40 years in the trenches, I intend to get the word out as much as I can and hereby ask your permission to copy and distribute the above — along with whatever else I may find on the subject.
    Thanking you in advance, I remain, your truly

  31. John on February 23, 2011 | Permalink

    William, please feel free to distribute the above as long as my name and website address remains attached. Thanks!

  32. William (Bill) Jones on February 23, 2011 | Permalink

    If I may? — as a Canadian who has made this subject the cornerstone of my life since 1969, I have debated with the best of them this side of the border. The major problem I have discovered in my experiences is that THIS IS NOT A DEBATE ABOUT FIREARMS!!
    Rather, it is a debate about RESPECT!! Those who wish to remove your firearms are (by association (and/or implication)accusing you of being either a criminal or a social menace. Be that as it may for those individuals who feel that way. BUT for ANYONE in public office (elected, appointed or hired) they OWE YOU ABSOLUTE RESPECT unless they can prove beyond a reasoned argument that you are otherwise. “Gun Control” is the ultimate indication of disrespect. I could go on, but having spent so many years ironing out the specious arguments which are only used to confuse the real issue, I have found that if one stays within that position, it does away with a lot of wasted breath. I am prepared to offer comment if anyone wishes. Thank you.

  33. John on March 9, 2011 | Permalink

    Thank YOU. I agree entirely, and that point alone should win the day.

POST A COMMENT

Your email is never published nor shared.

FOLLOW

John on Facebook

LISTEN

John at KLPZ

OP-ED

John Wright Op-Ed