Comments on: A War on Two Fronts http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-war-on-two-fronts Not Facebook Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:58:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Gman http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-588 Gman Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:40:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-588 Can't carry liquids because of liquid explosives.....then provide bins to pour liquids into. Thus mixing said liquids. Where is the logic in that, unless it is a farce?<br/>I am not an apologist and would gladly see any scumbag who wishes to inflict death on others as part of their idealism strung up by the goolies. Believing every piece of crap fed to me is not something I will do though. Remember the gulf of tonkin incident, eh? Can’t carry liquids because of liquid explosives…..then provide bins to pour liquids into. Thus mixing said liquids. Where is the logic in that, unless it is a farce?
I am not an apologist and would gladly see any scumbag who wishes to inflict death on others as part of their idealism strung up by the goolies. Believing every piece of crap fed to me is not something I will do though. Remember the gulf of tonkin incident, eh?

]]> By: Stephen http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-269 Stephen Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:52:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-269 Thanks S... Thanks S…

]]> By: S Quinney http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-239 S Quinney Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:30:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-239 Good article. Good article.

]]> By: Stephen http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-238 Stephen Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:41:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-238 John, that's the reason I wrote this piece - I couldn't find anyone else saying what I thought needed to be said. The only article I have seen since is a good one in the Daily Telegraph by Janet Daley, yesterday I think. Check it out if you can.<br/><br/>SG John, that’s the reason I wrote this piece – I couldn’t find anyone else saying what I thought needed to be said. The only article I have seen since is a good one in the Daily Telegraph by Janet Daley, yesterday I think. Check it out if you can.

SG

]]> By: John Wright http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-237 John Wright Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:39:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-237 Jeff- I'm not sure exactly what your point is here. What have we done wrong, exactly? (I'm not saying we aren't doing anything wrong, I'd just like you to dial it in better.) <br/><br/>I agree with Frank who said that Libertarian Reason is "one of the few [blogs] spelling it out quite this vividly...."; indeed that is the case. I made the same point as Stephen on William Crawley's BBC blog <a HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2006/08/is_this_pay-back.html#commentsanchor" REL="nofollow">here</a>, though Stephen has intricately dealt with the issues surrounding it here in a way that few other commentators have (to my knowledge).<br/><br/>Yet another reason why Libertarian Reason should be pride of place in everyone's bookmarks and RSS readers. Jeff- I’m not sure exactly what your point is here. What have we done wrong, exactly? (I’m not saying we aren’t doing anything wrong, I’d just like you to dial it in better.)

I agree with Frank who said that Libertarian Reason is “one of the few [blogs] spelling it out quite this vividly….”; indeed that is the case. I made the same point as Stephen on William Crawley’s BBC blog here, though Stephen has intricately dealt with the issues surrounding it here in a way that few other commentators have (to my knowledge).

Yet another reason why Libertarian Reason should be pride of place in everyone’s bookmarks and RSS readers.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-236 Jeff Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:46:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-236 I think we are seeing Islamist terror biting us in the butt for not paying attention to defending ourselves and being sensible as to where we are in the world. We shouldn't apologize for anyone, anywhere, anytime, our sole reason is to coexist and these people are threatening us because we've been stupid about where we've been. I think we are seeing Islamist terror biting us in the butt for not paying attention to defending ourselves and being sensible as to where we are in the world. We shouldn’t apologize for anyone, anywhere, anytime, our sole reason is to coexist and these people are threatening us because we’ve been stupid about where we’ve been.

]]> By: Stephen http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Stephen Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:29:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-235 Glad to be of help.<br/><br/>Did you sleep well?<br/><br/>SG Glad to be of help.

Did you sleep well?

SG

]]> By: Frank D Harlow http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/comment-page-1/#comment-233 Frank D Harlow Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:11:00 +0000 http://www.john-wright.net/2006/08/13/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comment-233 Bravo I couldn't agree more! Yet I am reading other blogs and yours is one of the few spelling it out quite this vividly, that being an apologist for terror is quite the same as treason. Thank you for your timely commentary, it's quite the way to head off to bed after a long day of listening to this bunkum. Bravo I couldn’t agree more! Yet I am reading other blogs and yours is one of the few spelling it out quite this vividly, that being an apologist for terror is quite the same as treason. Thank you for your timely commentary, it’s quite the way to head off to bed after a long day of listening to this bunkum.

]]>